draft-ietf-openpgp-camellia-04.txt  -->   rfc5581.txt

view Side-By-Side changes






Network Working Group                                            D. Shaw
Internet-Draft                                          December 5, 2008
Updates: 4880 (if approved)
Intended status: Standards Track
Expires:
Request for Comments: 5581                                     June 8, 2009
Updates: 4880
Category: Informational


                     The Camellia Cipher in OpenPGP
                     draft-ietf-openpgp-camellia-04

Status of this This Memo

   By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that

   This memo provides information for the Internet community.  It does
   not specify an Internet standard of any
   applicable patent or other IPR claims kind.  Distribution of which he or she this
   memo is aware
   have been or will be disclosed, unlimited.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2009 IETF Trust and any of which he or she becomes
   aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that
   other groups may also distribute working documents persons identified as Internet-
   Drafts.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is inappropriate subject to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to cite them other than as "work IETF Documents in progress."

   The list effect on the date of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.

   The list
   publication of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.

   This Internet-Draft will expire on June 8, 2009. this document (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
   Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
   and restrictions with respect to this document.

Abstract

   This document presents the necessary information to use the Camellia
   symmetric block cipher in the OpenPGP protocol.












Shaw                      Expires June 8, 2009                  [Page 1]

Internet-Draft       The Camellia Cipher in OpenPGP        December 2008

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2
   2.  Requirements notation Notation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2
   3.  Camellia  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2
   4.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2
   5.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3
   6.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
   Author's Address  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
   Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements  . . . . . . . . . . 5 3













Shaw                      Expires June 8, 2009                         Informational                      [Page 2]

Internet-Draft 1]

RFC 5581             The Camellia Cipher in OpenPGP        December 2008            June 2009


1.  Introduction

   The OpenPGP protocol [RFC4880] can support many different symmetric
   ciphers.  This document presents the necessary information to use the
   Camellia [RFC3713] symmetric cipher in the OpenPGP protocol.

2.  Requirements notation Notation

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].

3.  Camellia

   Camellia is specified in [RFC3713].  It is a 128-bit symmetric block
   cipher (as are AES and Twofish in OpenPGP), OpenPGP) that supports 128-bit,
   192-bit, and 256-bit keys.  This document defines the use of Camellia
   in OpenPGP.

     +---------------------+----------------------------------------+
     | Camellia Key Length | OpenPGP Symmetric-Key Algorithm Number |
     +---------------------+----------------------------------------+
     |         128         |                  XXXX                   11                   |
     |         192         |                  YYYY                   12                   |
     |         256         |                  ZZZZ                   13                   |
     +---------------------+----------------------------------------+

    [[To be allocated by IANA.  Please fill this in: presumably XXXX ==
                     11, YYYY == 12, and ZZZZ == 13]]

   OpenPGP applications MAY implement Camellia.  If implemented,
   Camellia may be used in any place in OpenPGP where a symmetric cipher
   is usable, and it is subject to the same usage requirements (such as
   its presence in the Preferred Symmetric Algorithms signature
   subpacket) as the other symmetric ciphers in OpenPGP.

   While the OpenPGP algorithm preferences system prevents
   interoperability problems with public key encrypted messages, if
   Camellia (or any other optional cipher) is used for encrypting
   private keys, there could be interoperability problems when migrating
   a private key from one system to another.  A similar issue can arise
   when using an optional cipher for symmetrically encrypted messages,
   as this OpenPGP message type does not perform cipher negotiation. use the algorithm preferences
   system.  Those using optional ciphers in this manner should take care
   they are using a cipher that their intended recipient can decrypt.





Shaw                      Expires June 8, 2009                  [Page 3]

Internet-Draft       The Camellia Cipher in OpenPGP        December 2008

4.  Security Considerations

   At publication time, there are no known weak keys for Camellia, and
   the Camellia algorithm is believed to be strong.  However, as with
   any technology involving cryptography, implementers should check the



Shaw                         Informational                      [Page 2]

RFC 5581             The Camellia Cipher in OpenPGP            June 2009


   current literature, as well as the Camellia home page at
   <http://info.isl.ntt.co.jp/camellia/>,
   http://info.isl.ntt.co.jp/camellia/ to determine if Camellia has been
   found to be vulnerable to attack.

5.  IANA Considerations

   This document requires

   IANA to assign assigned three algorithm numbers from the registry of OpenPGP
   Symmetric-Key Algorithms that was created by [RFC4880].

6.  Normative References

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

   [RFC3713]  Matsui, M., Nakajima, J., and S. Moriai, "A Description of
              the Camellia Encryption Algorithm", RFC 3713, April 2004.

   [RFC4880]  Callas, J., Donnerhacke, L., Finney, H., Shaw, D., and R.
              Thayer, "OpenPGP Message Format", RFC 4880, November 2007.

Author's Address

   David Shaw

   Email:

   EMail: dshaw@jabberwocky.com


























Shaw                      Expires June 8, 2009                         Informational                      [Page 4]

Internet-Draft       The Camellia Cipher in OpenPGP        December 2008


Full Copyright Statement

   Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2008).

   This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
   contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
   retain all their rights.

   This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
   "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
   OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND
   THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS
   OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF
   THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
   WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.


Intellectual Property

   The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
   Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
   pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
   this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
   might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
   made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information
   on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
   found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
   assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
   attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
   such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
   specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
   http://www.ietf.org/ipr.

   The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
   copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
   rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
   this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at
   ietf-ipr@ietf.org.











Shaw                      Expires June 8, 2009                  [Page 5] 3]

----